On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:54:14PM +0530, Viral wrote: > Hi, > > I am packaging a single binary package, vcdimager. The binary it contains > is called vcdrip. > > My question is, that for such simple packages, is it a good idea for the > name of the binary to coincide with the name of the package ? Then, if a > person installs a package, she knows what is the name of the binary too. > > Or is it better to stick with the conventions of the package. A good reason > to do so would be to stay in sync with the upstream conventions, and also > homogeneity with names on other distributions, which would presumably also > follow the upstream conventions.
It's always better to stick with upstream's naming conventions, IMHO.
That way if a user is familiar with the program on a non-Debian system,
they can come to Debian and find the same program names. If I install a
package and the binary name is not the same as the package name, a quick
dpkg -L <package> is all I need do to find out the name of the binary.
Cheers,
Timshel
--
Timshel Knoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for Debian email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Geomatics/Computer Science double degree, RMIT
Debian GNU/Linux developer, see http://people.debian.org/~timshel/
For GnuPG public key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpitFchErz2D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
