Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do I need to install non-free software if I want to sign packages on > potato?
Neither gpg (with or without RSA) nor the RSA module are non-DFSG, today, even if one is still sitting in non-free. Anyway, unless your key is RSA, you don't need the module for signing. Maybe removing a stray "load-extension rsa" is enough? > Since there is no /usr/lib/gnupg/rsa in unstable, would > backporting the unstable gnupg to potato solve this? Yes, sid's gnupg includes RSA. -- Robbe
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature
