Stefan Schwandter wrote: > I provided a snd-smotif package in addition to the snd-dmotif package, > because policy wants it like that, although some people agreed that it's > pointless to do so since openmotif is in debian (non-free).
> Now I received a bug report that snd-smotif should be in non-free > instead of contrib. My failure, didn't think of that then. > I now intend to just drop the -smotif package. Do I have to fear a > serious bug against snd-dmotif because there's not an -smotif version > anymore? After having read the policy again, I noticed that it's only a "should"-directive to provide both dynamically and statically linked versions of a motif using package - so I suppose I don't have to fear a serious bug report, right? regards, Stefan -- Wanna listen to my music? <------ ----> http://www.shockfrosted.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
