On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:49:29PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:11:20PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > > > I have a recent case of someone who NMU'ed packages of someone > > I do sponsor but I wasn't aware of that. > > For things like that the PTS is probably the way to go.
The PTS works with the BTS. > > I would like an entry point for communicating with the sponsoree > > so I can get informed about such events. > > Remember that with a BTS based solution the e-mails aren't going to miss > either you or the person being sponsored by default and there's no > particular reason why anyone is going to know that the package has been > sponsored. If the maintainer is not registered in the developer's database, the package has surely been sponsored. -- Jérôme Marant
