On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 09:51:29PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:17:15AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 05:06:14PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > The source is fine there, but binaries must not go in /usr/share. If > > > the demos are useful in binary form, they should go in /usr/bin. If > > > they are only useful as programming examples, they should ship in source > > > form only. > > > > Wouldn't it be more problematic than necassary in case the library changes > > so-name? You'd have to make the different version conflict then, as they > > contain the same files in /usr/bin. > > Only if they ship in the shared library package (which they shouldn't).
Regardless, wouldn't /usr/lib/<package> also be a good place? (also avoids cluttering up the namespace..) -- Duncan Findlay
