Hello, Isn't http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#forward self-contradictory? | Make sure that the To field of your message to the author to has only | the author(s) address(es) in it; put both the person who reported the | bug and [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the CC field. | | Ask the author to preserve the CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED] when they | reply, so that the bug tracking system will file their reply with the | original report. | | When the bug tracking system gets a message at nnn-forwarded it will | mark the relevant bug as having been forwarded to the address(es) in | the To field of the message it gets.
What will happen? The author replies *to* *me* and CCs nnn-forwarded,
and according to the last quoted paragraph the BTS will mark the
bugreport as forwarded *to* *me*. Either the documentation of what
nnn-forwarded does or the description "how to forward a bug-report" is
wrong.
If the documentation of nnn-forwarded is correct, simply setting
"Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" in the initial message to the upstream
author (and nnn-forwarded) should work much better. - The discussion
is archived in the BTS and I get the messages anyway, because I'm
either the maintainer or at least subscribed to the package via PTS.
thanks, cu andreas
--
"See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha.
Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"
pgprOUc3ITjUv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
