also sprach Roger Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.04.22.0028 +0200]: > Get MIT to release the software under a freely distributable > sourcecode license. It does not have to be GPL, but any OSI type > license should be sufficient. Source code, in my understanding, is > required for everything in Debian (of course some applications > *are* their own source code).
Sure, I'll try... > When the License is not clear, more importantly, when you did not > follow the license to get the software, it *cannot* be packaged. > If they grant permission, get them to send a license file, or > something similar which will make the first part a bit easier to > solve. I am not sure I understand what you mean. The license does allow redistribution, and I do have written permission to package it... -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Keyserver problems? http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/keyserver.html Get my key here: http://madduck.net/me/gpg/publickey
pgp5P5P9t8tQP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
