On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 01:04:52PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Pete Ryland wrote: > > > Or would you like to accuse me of tampering with the list archives while > > > you're at it? > > > > Oh, ok. If you'd like. ;-) > > Consider me offended. <g>
:-) > > > Out of interest, are there any MUAs which have a separate "reply to > > > list" function? > > > > Most do AFAIK. Not sure about pine, but then it's not in Debian anyway. > > I knew that sitting in my little side-water of not-really-free software > would cost me. It seems the world has passed me by. > > > I use a catch all lists in my procmail, so I don't have to do anything > > when I join a new list: > > Pure art. Very nice. Pardon me while I <snarf> those rules. BTW, I'm not claiming authorship. They were, in turn, snarfed from jdub's page at: http://perkypants.org/dotfiles/ Sorry, should have mentioned that before. But yes, indeed, very nice. Pete -- Pete Ryland http://pdr.cx/
