Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Am Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2003 16:43 schrieb Christoph Berg: >> Re: Advice needed for packaging sigcperl library and SigC perl >> module [Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wed, May 14, 2003 at >> 03:36:08PM +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] >> >> > - libsigcperl-0.2 (the helper library) >> > - libsigcperl-dev (the development files) >> > - libsigc-perl (its a binary perl module) >> >> Why not libsigc-perl-0.2 and libsigc-perl-dev to be consistent? > > Hmm, the upstream name of this is "sigcperl" and wouldn't this naming > scheme even more irritating ?
Definitely. I would expect libsigc-perl to be some virtual package for installing libsigc-perl-0.2 or libsigc-perl-0.1.3 or libsigc-perl-bla. Why does the library have the version in its number, but not the development package? What about the development packages for the to-come library libsigcperl-0.4? Bye, Frank -- Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
