[CC'ed debian-mentors, as I'm really clueless here] Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Andreas, > > > It seems your package libsigcx prevents libsigc++ and some packages > depending on it from moving into testing. Can you please look into > this issue ? > > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=libsigc%2B%2B-1.2&expand=1 > I've wondered about this, too and I don't quite understand why libsigcx isn't going into testing, since I really don't grok this one: http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=libsigcx&expand=1 What strikes me is this (from above URL): ,---- | Updating libsigcx makes 4 packages uninstallable on alpha: libsigcx-0.6-1, libsigcx-0.6-dev, libsigcx-gtk-0.6-1, libsigcx-gtk-0.6-dev | | * libsigcx-0.6-1 has no testing candidate | * libsigcx-0.6-dev has no testing candidate | * libsigcx-gtk-0.6-1 has no testing candidate | * libsigcx-gtk-0.6-dev has no testing candidate `---- So how can libsigcx break it's own binary packages (libsigcx-0.6-1, libsigcx-0.6-dev, ...), which aren't even in testing yet: ,---- | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% madison libsigcx-0.6-1 libsigcx-0.6-dev libsigcx-gtk-0.6-1 libsigcx-gtk-0.6-dev | grep testing | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% `---- And furthermore: Why do they have no testing canditate? Any help really appreciated. Regards, Andy -- Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 Packages should build-depend on what they should build-depend.
