On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:23:19AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:53:45AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-21 19:15]: > > > Boggle. Your sponsor just signed something you'd built? Sponsors are > > > supposed to build packages themselves, not accept binaries from > > > elsewhere. > > > > He runs a m68k buildd, so building his packages again kind of defeats > > the whole purpose... > > I'm not sure I'd ever considered the possibility of a non-developer > running a buildd properly. Perhaps somebody else could be the buildd > operator who does all the signing and uploading and Goswin could host > and maintain it? > > (Or maybe this is already the case and I've just misunderstood.)
Or he could be made a DD, and all this discussion will be void. I have really came to know him only since the oldenburg meeting a bit less than a month ago, but i guess he would be no worse than our average DD, and he has sure done more work in this last month that our average DD does, especially on the debian-installer work. Friendly, Sven Luther
