Hi. Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Two quick things on the checklist: - Maybe do add a quirk that the prospective packager should (or even say must) have read the canonical docs (policy, d.'s r., newmaint) and that the checklist not a subsitute. Every now and then I do get the impression that some (fortunately not many) sponsor-seekers didn't (e.g. when they didn't package the source...). You could argue that this is implied, but there's bound to be the ones that do the "why, if there's a checklist, I don't have to go through all the policy myself". - For descriptions, there also is [1], which seems to be pretty canonical.
Cheers T. 1. http://people.debian.org/~walters/descriptions.html
