Hallo list, hallo Jochen, (Jochen beeing my gdal sponsor) a few days ago someone posted an error of my gdal-package [1] on its related developer list [2]. The problem has been fixed upstream and I want now repackage gdal to eliminate this bug in debian.
The problem is, that there is no official gdal release of version
1.2 so I decided in december to package a cvs snapshot (s. here [3]
for a full discussion of the reasons).
My question is now: should I fix the above mentioned bug based on
the already used snapshot from november or can I just release a new
package version named 1.2+cvs.20040212? This package would of course
not only fix the bug but also include new features of gdal and fix
some other bugs.
I would prefer to do the second option but I am not sure whether
the tarball will be accepted then.
Greetings,
Silke
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gdal.html
[2] http://remotesensing.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2004-February/001913.html
[3]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2003/debian-mentors-200310/msg00247.html
--
Silke Reimer
Intevation GmbH http://intevation.de/
FreeGIS http://freegis.org/
pgpDpVNCTFk1v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
