"Bruno Barrera C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 18:24, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >> On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Bruno Barrera C. wrote: >> > - I Think you must read [0](Looking at the Architecture field) >> Upstream supports only i386 and I somehow doubt that the source is 64bit >> clean (I currently have no way to test this, though). What is the >> preferred method of handling this? Just set architecture to any and see >> what happens on other archs. Or first try to determine which architectures >> work? > I think the best idea is try to determine in which architectures it will > work, because if you set architecture any and it doesn't work in some, > your package will be in a hard and long way to get into testing :).
No, it won't. It's no problem for a package if it fails to build on an
arch it was never built on before.
For a NM, without access to the Debian project machines to test the
package, the easiest way is to release the it with Arch: any, look at
the build logs and fix all errors (or, if that doesn't work, change the
Architecture: header).
Update: I've just tested the build on merulo.d.o (ia64), no problem
there. OTOH, you should really fix those warnings (the same ones you see
when compiling on i386).
Marc
--
$_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever })e$.)4/3*
)e$(htgnel+23(rhc,"u"(kcapnu ,""nioj ;|_- |/+9-0z-aZ-A|rt~=e$;_$=e${pam tnirp{y
V2ajFGabus} yV2ajFGa&{gwmclBHIbus}gwmclBHI&{yVGa09mbbus}yVGa09mb&{hBCdzVnSbus';
s/\n//g;s/bus/\nbus/g;eval scalar reverse # <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpjEIyakFNqt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
