On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:39:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > If I read the code, it seems like there's something funky with the first > variable argument. What I have for now is: > > -Tcl_AppendResult(Tcl_Interp *interp, char *p, va_alist) > +void Tcl_AppendResult(Tcl_Interp *interp, ...) > > Can this be right (neglecting the char *p parameter)? It seems like > they're reading in the first argument (the constant, interp) using > va_arg. That's why I left out p; it never gets used!
It's usually better to leave char *p in the prototype and adjust the code that's using it to use that argument as a normal function argument, then read the remaining arguments using va_arg(). Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
