On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 09:18:12AM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Saturday 14 August 2004 03:16, Wesley J Landaker wrote: > > On Friday 13 August 2004 19:06, Adam Majer wrote: > > > Frederik Dannemare wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I was hoping that my previous sponsor of motion would have the > > > > time this week to do a new upload which has a couple of very > > > > small fixes, but unfortunately I haven't heard from him yet, so > > > > I'm really, really > > > > > > I'll look at it and upload within an hour or so (unless there are > > > problems). > > > > I saw a copy of Frederik's same e-mail in debian-mentors earlier > > today and already checked it over and uploaded. My only concern was > > that it's not quite up-to-date with the latest upstream (3.1.14 vs > > 3.1.16), but since it's a bugfix, I went ahead and sponsored. > > When I adopted the package, I chose to update from 3.0.6 to 3.1.14, and > not 3.1.15/3.1.16, because I personally feel 3.1.14 is the most stable > of them. .15 had a lot of problems, and although .16 fixed much of > this, I still feel 3.1.14 is the better choice for the sarge release. > > Many thanks for the upload, Wesley. I really appreciate it. And thank > you, Adam, for once again offering to help me with an upload.
BTW, what is the deal with motion and 2.6 kernels ? I am under the understanding that it requires the videoloop or whatever module, which is not only abandoned upstream, but also not yet ported to 2.6 kernels. Friendly, Sven Luther
