On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 09:06:01AM -0700, Paul Telford wrote: > On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, Steve Langasek wrote: > > digikam has been removed from testing, because it depended on libexif9. > > The version of digikam in unstable will almost certainly depend on > > kdelibs4 3.3 once it's been successfully built on mipsel. This means > > the version in unstable will almost certainly not make it into sarge > > because of KDE 3.3 not being ready in time.
> > If you want digikam to be included in sarge, please upload it to > > testing-proposed-updates. [...] > The current version in unstable is 0.6.2-3. I have built 0.6.2-4 for > sarge (simply bumped the version #) and 0.6.2-3sarge1 for t-p-u. I plan > to upload the unstable version first so that sarge < unstable. Why do you need to upload to unstable at all? Is there something wrong with the version in unstable? Can't you simply upload 0.6.2-3 unchanged (except for debian/changelog) as 0.6.2-2sarge1 to testing? cu andreas