Hi. Nicolas Boullis wrote: > If there's currently no way to set up such things, it might be worth > suggesting to add such a feature to next-generation .deb format. Don't > you think so? To be honest, no. If you do a Recommends: udev (>= ...), most people will just install the recommended udev and be fine. People who have reason to not like to use udev will just not. Most people won't want to make a decision, so it's of no use giving them the choice. Those who want to choose will read the README.Debian to see what's going on. For the others: Do venture a single recommondation.
> Oh, and I just thought there could be a workaround. I could make a new > no-udev empty package that conflicts with udev, and then write > "Recommends: no-udev | udev (>= 0.060-1)". > I guess this would behave as expected, but I think that having one more > package only for this would be quite insane! Let's not. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
