Hi, On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 11:22:44AM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Frank Küster wrote: > > Nicolas Boullis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Oh, and I just thought there could be a workaround. I could make a new > > > no-udev empty package that conflicts with udev, and then write > > > "Recommends: no-udev | udev (>= 0.060-1)". > > > > An elegant solution ;-) > > > > > I guess this would behave as expected, but I think that having one more > > > package only for this would be quite insane! > > > > Especially because others would pick up the idea... > > Can dpkg/apt/etc. be tweaked to automatically Provides: no-* ?
If they were to be tweaked, I'd rather like them to understand something like "Recommends: !udev || udeb (>= 0.060-1)" rather than give a special meaning to a prefix that would be perfectly legal in a package name. Cheers, Nicolas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
