On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 02:16:27PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > Hi, Kumar... > > Thanks for your contribution. Please allow me to comment on your > package:
First, many thanks for the patient review. > - the upstream tarball (orig.tar.gz) on your web server seems > to be incomplete (just contains PKG-INFO and README). I downloaded > the tarball from SourceForge. Have corrected that. > - the README.Debian is superfluous since it does not contain more > information than already provided in debian/control. Please remove > it. Removed. > - the debian/docs contains two files that are not very helpful for the > user. The instructions on installing the package are in fact > misleading. I have edited it, and added a message saying Debian users have it installed already. > - please remove the parts of the debian/rules that you commented out Done, to the best of my knowledge. > - since the package is meant to be for "Architecture: all" you do not > need everything you are running in the *-arch targets. Done that. > - since python2.4 is out you may consider creating a second binary > package (hint: debian/control) python2.4-goopy Done, though I didn't actually get your hint. > - you do not have a build dependency on python. Building in a "pbuilder" > failed here due to unsatisfied dependencies. My builds now depend on python2.3 as well as python2.3-dev for the python2.3 version. Please do verify whether they adhere to the necessary standards. I have uploaded them again to http://kumar.travisbsd.org/debpackages Thanks again. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
