On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 10:36:39AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > On 12-Sep-2005, Carlos Parra Camargo wrote: > > IMO, the description should be about the application, it shouldn't > > be a comparative. > > Agreed. I'd say rather that enough information about the application > should be included so that the reader can make their own comparison.
You can do both. If your package has feature "flaming unicycles" while package foo does not, just mention that feature, but no need to mention that foo doesn't have it. Putting it another way. You are a user and you want a web calendar thingy? Which package satisfies your requirements better? Obviously there is only so much a package description can do. - Craig (who longs for the day one of these things is buildable AND integrates into OE) -- Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 Eye-Net Consulting http://www.enc.com.au/ MIEE Debian developer csmall at : enc.com.au ieee.org debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
