* Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-15 12:16]: > Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Doc packages are usually called package-doc. I see no reason to change > > that here, except that adding non-free seems to make sense. Removing > > "lib" would just confuse the name, because it would be less clear which > > package the doc is for. > > I prefer -tutorial to -doc in this particular case, since otherwise when > browsing the package list I'd think I'd have to install the -doc package > to get any documentation at all (rather than just a separate tutorial).
This is a sensible suggestion but, since you did not Cc: it to me as I requested in my first post, it came too late. The package is already uploaded with the name libparse-recdescent-perl-doc-nonfree. It's too bad, because I would had 3rd place in the longest-package-name contest in Debian, only behind libbusiness-onlinepayment-bankofamerica-perl and libbusiness-onlinepayment-authorizenet-perl. Perhaps I can find a way to upload libbusiness-onlinepayment-bankofamerica-perl-tutorial-nonfree? :-) -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
