On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 02:24:15AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > Jonas Genannt [Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:14:55 +0200]: > > > I'm searching for a sponsor for Kat. > > Uhm. Can you explain what's going on with the ITP? > > 2005-05-14: #309068 - ITP: kat, by Jean-Remy Falleri > 2005-09-16: #328610 - RFP: kat, by Nicolas DEGAND > 2005-09-22: you retitle #328610 to ITP > 2005-09-22, one hour later: you merge #328610 with #309068, without > mention whether you've contacted Jean-Remy or not.
I just checked both packages. The package of Jean-Remy Falleri looks a bit strange actually. The README talks about "kdeplayground" instead of "kat". Perhaps just a copy/paste error. I didn't look much deper into it. Jonas' package looks reasonable to me. Some minor things I'm not instantly happy about: - Of course the ITP/merge/RFP/RFS issue should be clarified. - The kat/doc/Makefile should probably be cleaned away. It's contained in the .diff.gz - The description of "libkat0" in the debian/rules reads "This package contains the katlibraries." I'd like to rephrase it like "This package contains the library that are used by the kat desktop search environment." - The copyright doesn't include the year of copyright. It also lacks the "e" of "file" at the end. - The README and TODO files don't look very helpful to the end-user. - The README.Debian doesn't contain anything that isn't found in the other files anyway. Regards Christoph -- ~ ~ ~ ".signature" [Modified] 3 lines --100%-- 3,41 All -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
