Hello, On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 11:07:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 10:24:27PM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > > > > The package seems almost lintian clean (2 warnings about outdated > > > > config.sub/config.guess which are patched during the build, so it should > > > > not generate any real errors). > > > > > > Any reason not to put the correct version in the .diff.gz? > > > > > > > I think it is best to keep the correct version in a dpatch file which i > > can easily send to upstream. I like to have only debian/ in the diff.gz > > (but it is only a matter of taste). I try to always use pristine > > upstream source. > > I recommend that you build depend on the autotools-dev package > instead (which is already pulled in) and that you upgrade to that > version at build time. >
I don't see the problem with sending a patch to upstream... I don't like to auto upgrade part of the source: it should break the build system of the upstream author... > You should probably take a look at the license of your > documentation. I have to wonder what "modified versions [...] > under the conditions for verbatim copying" means. That seem to > conflict with itself. > Yes, it seems to be auto conflicting. > You also might want to look into the license of src/alloca.c. > It seems to be public domain (fast reading). I don't see the problem ? Regards Sylvain Le Gall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
