Paul Wise wrote:
Jean-Marc Ranger wrote:
There are no signs of an ITP ( Intented To Package )
Please file an "ITP bugreport"
I thought it was optional.
Why would it be optional? Why would you want to prevent duplication of
effort and track your packaging progress?
I could *try* to justify my position for hours, but basically, you're
right. There's no point in duplicate work, and in some way, it's a good
introduction to the BTS at the same time. Even more, there's nothing in
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html that lead to
think in optional. You're well-placed to know since you're the credited
author :) So agreed, my mistake.
As stated previously, fixed in http://bugs.debian.org/333237
Other comments ?
Jean-Marc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
