On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 10:44:00AM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Tommaso Moroni wrote: > > The knights package uses dpatch to correct some mistakes in > > po/de.po, thus generating a po/de.gmo which is different from the > > upstream source. While this doesn't affect the package build, a > > second build fails because of unrepresentable change to po/de.gmo. > > > > Should a package be rebuildable consecutive multiple times? > > Yes. This is the popular interpretation of policy 4.8, subparagraph "clean".
-- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
