On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 10:41 +0100, Joost van Baal wrote: > Hi, > > Op do 24 nov 2005 om 09:34:30 +0100 schreef Adriaan Peeters: > > > > For my ITP (#333680) I need a new version of libglademm [1,2]. > > Could you add a note why this is needed to Bug #333730?
It is already there. > > Unfortunately the current maintainer seems not very responsive, with > > several of his bugs open for years [3]. We are all volunteers and I do > > understand that he can be occupied, but as I am no DD, I cannot check > > whether is on vacation or if there is more information on him being MIA. > > > > What is the right course of action? Several of his bugs are quite > > trivial to fix, so maybe some help could speed things up considerably. > > Did you read "7.4. Dealing with inactive and/or unreachable maintainers" > in the Debian Developer's Reference? Yes, I did. But I am no DD, so I cannot check "echelon". > Some ideas: You could sent patches for libglademm to the BTS. You could > offer to become comaintainer of libglademm. You could suggest to the > maintainer to post a RFH. Patches for several bugs are available, also for libglademm. I contacted the maintainer, but no response yet. In the mean time my e-mail has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so I guess they will handle it. We will have to wait a bit more :) Adriaan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
