I maintain a package, aplus-fsf, that includes fonts in PCF format in order to display its APL characters in XEmacs and xterms. I put these in a separate package called xfonts-kapl, which installs the fonts in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc and also creates a file in /etc/X11/fonts. The postinst calls update-fonts-dir and update-fonts-alias. This package is in the Recommends field of the other packages. This works fine.
There is related HTML documentation for aplus-fsf in a separate package, aplus-fsf-doc, that also requires a special font (in TTF format) to display the APL characters properly in web browsers. I found that installing these fonts in /usr/share/fonts and running fc-cache makes these available in Firefox, but I am not sure that is the right thing to do. What distinguishes which fonts go in /usr/lib/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts and which go in /usr/share/fonts? Should the fonts for both purposes above go into the xfonts-kapl package, or should the TTF fonts for the the aplus-fsf-doc package go into the aplus-fsf-doc package, or should they go into a new, separate package which is then named in the Recommends field of aplus-fsf-doc? -- Neil Roeth -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
