Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For new deployment of patch systems, I would strongly encourage using > quilt instead of dpatch. It has much better handling of patch > dependencies than any of the others, and much more user friendly patch > editing/creating capabilities.
> The xorg, glibc, and samba packages, for instance, are all using quilt > today. Oh, interesting. I'd been noticing it in use by large packages, but I wasn't aware it was at the point where it was a reasonable alternative to dpatch even for smaller ones. I'll have to take a closer look. Thanks! -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
