On Friday 27 January 2006 17:31, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: > I need a sponsor for pyme package. My previous sponsor doesn't have the > time currently to review the package i have made.
So far so good. Just some thoughts: - Wouldn't it be better if the (source) package were called "python-pyme" instead of just "pyme"? - The README.Debian doesn't add much value. You mention python-pyme-doc in the "Suggests:" anyway. On the other hand a pointer to the examples might be useful. - I'm not a CDBS guru but you list debian/README.Debian in the debian/docs file and also in the rules file. Isn't that redundant? - In case you still want to list the README.Debian in debian/docs: you use a general "debian/docs" but also a more specific file "debian/python-pyme-doc.docs". I personally prefer to use only specific files to make clear which packages has to install which files. - What worse: the package doesn't build in a pbuilder environment. "sh: gpgme-config: command not found" probably means that you missed a dependency. - There is already a package called "python-gnupginterface" in Debian. In what way is PyMe different? Since I couldn't build the package I haven't lintian checked it. Could you take a look at it again? Thanks. Kindly Christoph -- Never trust a system administrator who wears a tie and suit. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
