I've repackaged TreeLine in only one orig files (that includes upstream tarballs inside). The new files can be found, again, at:
http://baby.yi.org/packages/treeline/ BTW, Does anyone has a clue about which programs are used to translate .ts / .qm files? Greetings, Miry --- Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Hi Dato :) > > --- Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > > * Miriam Ruiz [Thu, 02 Feb 2006 09:31:22 +0100]: > > > > Hi, > > > > > My packages can temporarily be found at: > > http://baby.yi.org/packages/treeline/ > > > > The packages look good. I can upload them, these are my only concerns: > > Thanks :) > > > (1) As per upstream's require.html, the spell checker is not an > > absolute dependency, and aspell is normally preferred. What about > > this?: > > > > -Depends: python, python-qt3, ispell, ${misc:Depends} > > +Depends: python, python-qt3, ${misc:Depends} > > +Recommends: aspell | ispell > > Yes you're right. That may be more sensible. I've updated it. > > > (2) [minor suggestion, I don't mind leaving it as is] I'd personally > > leave the end of this sentence out of the Debian description. > > > > TreeLine is written in Python and uses the PyQt bindings to the Qt > > - toolkit, which makes it very portable. > > + toolkit. > > I don't really mind too much, I've corrected it as it might be redundant for > the description. It might be of interest to users knowing that they can be > able to take their data files (xml) to many systems, but the last words > probably are redundant with the rest of the sentence. > > > (3) > > > > > Package: treeline-i18n > > > Description: translation files for treeline data manager > > > > Despite upstream shipping these two in separate tarballs, two separate > > binaries _and_ source seems an overkill to me. Perhaps other -mentors > > readers will disagree, but I'd look into shipping the translations in > > the treeline package itself (most packages do ship translations > > themselves, don't they?). This would mean repackaging, though. > > I found it overkill too, I was just not sure whether to repackage it (maybe > putting original .tgz files inside a .orig.tar.gz?) or to leave them as they > are. Do you think it might be better to repackage them? If I repackaged the > original tarballs, would it be better to have just one binary? > > > Cheers, > > Greetings, > Miry ______________________________________________ LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]