Am Montag, den 13.02.2006, 01:24 -0600 schrieb Peter Samuelson: > [Daniel Leidert] > > Am Sonntag, den 12.02.2006, 20:01 +0100 schrieb Marc Haber: > > > It has now shown to be necessary to apply patches to the upstream > > > docs. I would like to use dpatch for that. > > > > Could you also write a bug-report for dpatch? This is a feature I also > > miss and I would of course support such a request. > > Well, note that (1) is already possible and not even all that hard.
Of course, but it's a "useless" patch. You better remove that patch from the source when making the final package, because the patch would increase the package-source size. But if you then make a new package revision, you have to re-add this patch again. There should be an easier solution. Maybe only add a possibility to define one or more targets to run after creating the clean workspace. That's IMHO a clean and easy to use/implement solution. > That is, to have a .dpatch file whose purpose is to unpack the tarball > on 'patch' and delete the tree on 'unpatch'. But as I said: Such a patch would be big and it should not stay inside the package-source. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
