Hi Marco, On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 17:18 +0100, Marco Cabizza wrote: > It's quite stable and usable by now. Can this be a good candidate for > experimental? Yes.
> It "Conflict"'s with gaim so that if you don't want gaim 1.5 removed you > can just prevent gaim-snapshot from installing if you don't want it. I don't think this is a good idea. You should remain with the gaim package name, just use a normal package version. So if the CVS version just adds some tweaks use stable_version+cvsdate; if it is a candidate for a new upstream release, use (stabletobe_version-minor)+cvsdate. So if new upstream version is going to 1.5, use 1.49+cvs060310 as a package version. > Can anybody review (and hopefully upload) those? I have nor sponsors nor > advocates, by now. It may sound rude, but I hope all will say no. I don't think messing with an existing package would be good; ask the gaim maintainer, Robert McQueen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> about blessing. OK, we can review your packages, but upload is a no-no, at least by me. Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
