Justin Pryzby wrote: > Your first Closes entry isn't terminated with a closing/right > parenthesis; not that it really matters. Fixed > You need to include the years of copyright (if available). Put copyright 2002-2006 > Your rules file is set up as if you produced both -arch and -indep > packages, but that isn't the case. In particular, you don't need > DH_OPTIONS at all. That must be because originally I was producing 2 packages. Deleted the extra stuff. > "useless use of cat" in the install target; you should probably just > rely on the debhelper tools to do everything like: > creating links > compressing files > creating directories > installing files Fixed manpage installation. However, I can't use dh_installdocs, because using it on installwatch's documentation would overwrite the checkinstall files. I would have to rename the files in the source (the same reason dh_install doesn't help). > You have sed commands, which aren't necessarily bad, but you could > probably just include the changes in the .diff.gz. Some are actually needed (installwatch has a hack to detect if it has been installed). I used sed scripts because I didn't want to modify the original source files (specially on the configuration file). Deleted them, and modified the source. > binary depends on build and install, but install already depends on > build. I don't know why the template is like this; I'm filing a bug > now.. Done. > Your modified makefile might use install -s to install the library, > rather than cp. Done. > BTW, did you ever figure out why dpkg wasn't allowing you to directly > install the new package? No. However, I've been playing a bit, and dpkg -B causes the package to install.
Reuploaded the package. -- Felipe Sateler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
