Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have often wondered if it would be useful to have a check (say, in > lintian ...) grepping the binary package contents for the build > directory ... assuming that the build directory is a sufficiently long > string, perhaps larger binary packages will need longer build paths, but > this doesn't seem like a real problem; /buildd/ itself is long enough to > make a random occurance in an enourmous package beyond unlikely.
> I suspect the only think preventing this from being implemented is that > too many things would be affected .. All debugging information, for instance, I believe embeds the name of the build directory. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
