On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 01:21:36PM +0300, Panu Kalliokoski wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 04:50:29PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote: > > >Some issues seem to come up time and again when somebody inspects RFS'd > > >packages. Some of these are not breaches of policy but simply bad > > >practices, like leaving quoted dh_* commands in debian/rules. > > I do that all the time. It is much easier to see that a program is not > On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 12:33:53PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote: > > Whether someone thinks is "bad practise", the other may think it "more > > maintainable". > > Well, I must add that I don't find the recommendation very smart either, > but probably there's somebody out there that has terrible difficulties > in not reading commented-out lines or something like that. I personally > find dh_make-generated rules files hard to read in general, mostly > because the meaning of all those commands keeps changing eh?
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
