[I'm subscribed, not need to Cc] On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 12:43 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote: > Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Agree. Also, binary ones sounds better for me; or if someone would like > > to reinvent the wheel, then please do it in Python instead of Perl. > I certainly hope this is just your opinion and isn't official debian > advice... I know Perl has far more use in general and Python said to be a bit overweight or so (I haven't follow the opinions for a while). But just to be clear: this is _my_ opinion and _not an official Debian advice_. An other reason is that Perl is installed far more sooner as a dependency, so such a rewritten package program would be installed without too much other dependency.
On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 15:57 -0400, Alec Berryman wrote: > Forget rewriting them, how about just aggregating them into one > package? Sounds better. I mean to one binary with switches like --from=<img_format> and --to=<img_format> . Cheers, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
