El Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:56:00 +0300 George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Friday 14 July 2006 10:08, Bas Wijnen wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:34:20AM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > > > > > shc (3.8.6-1) unstable; urgency=low > > > > > > > > ^^^^^^^ > > > > > > > > This is the wrong version number for an NMU anyway. > > > > > > True. Fixed as -0.1. Hm, it would be nice if lintian and linda > > > warn if changelog claims Non-maintainer upload and the > > > debian-revision value is not compliant with the conventions > > > > They do. However, since you added yourself as comaintainer (via > > Uploaders:), they didn't actually consider it an NMU. > > That also should be catched and warned, since an NMU done by a > maintaner makes no sense. It's not very common, but it does: the NMU is prepared by another non-DD and the package maintainer sponsors it. -- Ricardo Mones. ~ "You will have a long and unpleasant discussion with your supervisor." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
