[Apologies for replying to my own message again, but Adam keeps mentioning things in other channels to which I cannot respond]
On (09/09/06 19:57), James Westby wrote: > After discussion on IRC it seems that a compile flag is wanted to do > this. > Ok, in #361400 you say you are not happy with the "included patch", which patch do you mean by this? You then said on IRC that you had found a better solution, but the current version on mentors appears to have my first patch used. If you are after a different solution could you please explain what you are trying to achieve, and where my patches fall short. James -- James Westby -- GPG Key ID: B577FE13 -- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
