Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > Christoph Haas wrote: > >> On Saturday 16 September 2006 14:20, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: >> >> >>> Christoph Haas wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "museek+". >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I don't know why but the upstream tarball I just downloaded from >>>> http://puzzle.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/museek-plus/museek+-0.1.1 >>>> 1.tar.bz2 differs in several places from the orig.tar.gz that you >>>> provide. >>>> >>>> >>> I took one or two revision from svn that fixes license issues.... >>> Do you want me to apply them through dpatch ? >>> >>> >> Yes please. Otherwise it's hard to understand what you patched and why. If >> you really need to package a CVS/SVN version instead of the upstream's >> last stable release then consider using an upstream version >> like "0.99.4+cvs20060813". >> >> > I know how to deal with svn version but we did too much changes to > consider current trunk as "stable". > That's why I just apply three svn revision to the latest stable release :) > >> The theory is that a user can get the upstream's tarball, apply Debian's >> diff.gz patch and get a working package. The diff.gz contains everything >> you have done. That user would be surprised if the diff.gz didn't work >> with the upstream version you specify. >> >> > It's now done but I have a strange problem I didn't noticed before. The > first time I build the package I get "missing target > install-python-museek2.3". If I restart package building it works fine. > > James is having a look, I hope he will understand what it is. Could you > check the package too ? It's still available at mentors, same link than > before. > > Thanks ! > > > >> Christoph >> >> > > > It's now fixed :)
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
