On (25/09/06 01:48), Francesco Namuri wrote: > On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:15:22PM +0100, James Westby wrote: > > If copyright has been asserted on the file then it must be mentioned in > > debian/rules, along with its distribution license. If there isn't one > > you should find out what it is and add it, or drop the file. > > It's not my solution, :) > I have found it taking a look in the dpatch examples > (/usr/share/doc/dpatch/examples/dpatch/01_config.dpatch.gz). > considering that it is among the examples of dpatch, I have thought that > it is released under GPL, your opinion?
If dpatch is under GPL then yes probably, but confirmation should be sought. You can also check the debian/copyright of dpatch, as it should be documented in there. James -- James Westby -- GPG Key ID: B577FE13 -- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
