On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 05:09:51PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:28:14PM +1000, Matthew Palmer a écrit : > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:44:14PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > For one of the packages I created, the upstream sources I used were a > > > version 1.x accidentally released as version 2.0 on sourceforge. > > > > "Accidentally"? > > Well, SourceForge was offering "poa_release_2_0.tar.gz" for a few > months, and it recently changed to "poaV2.tar.gz". I contacted the > upstram author, and he explained me that poa_release_2_0.tar.gz was > supposed to contain sources tagged "release_2_0" in their CVS > repository, but in fact contained an older version. > > My first version of the package is poa_2.0-1, and is based on > poa_release_2_0.tar.gz, which is not version 2.0.
What's upstream doing about it now? Are they releasing a 2.0.1 or 2.1 or 3 or something to replace that one, or are they just sticking with the V2 package? Again, what are upstream's plans? That will have a massive bearing on what you do. - Matt
