On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 03:44:20PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Kurt, > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:52:47PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > > > Re: Michael Tautschnig 2006-10-25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Furthermore, I'd like to add some notes: Probably brickos and the Lego > > > > Mindstorms Kit is the only use of this and related packages. As such I > > > > wonder > > > > whether it is worth trying to upgrade to binutils 2.16.x and gcc-4.x, > > > > because > > > > this very outdated version of binutils and gcc just works for this very > > > > special > > > > application. > > > > > > As seen on [1], brickos (still) doesn't build on amd64. It looks like > > > a porting problem in binutils, so that might be fixed by upgrading. > > > > > > [1] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=brickos > > > > The new binutils doesn't seem to be better, maybe it also needs the new > > gcc. > > > Not sure whether you are now talking about building brickos or > binutils-h8300-hms; the latter have seen a new upload last night, which seems > to > build nicely. I'm about to prepare new gcc and brickos packages as well, > hopefully that will be done by tonight.
When binutils-h8300-hms was build and uploaded/installed on amd64, I've rescheduled brickos, which now failed with a different error. I assume that gcc and binutils aren't compatible. I'll see what happens when the new gcc is uploaded. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
