On Tue December 5 2006 16:08, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > Quick side question resulting from off-list discussions: > > This package conflicts with (custom-built) pine packages many people > have been using. Okay if I make alpine "Conflicts: pine" and > "Replaces: pine"?
not necessarily "custom-built", see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/getpine/linux.html > Also, I think it would be useful if /usr/bin/pine were a symlink to > /usr/bin/alpine? Old-time users might expect just "pine" to work. > Okay to do that? I think that the two packages should be able to coexist, if possible, at least until alpine stops being an "alpha" product. So, maybe hold off on replacing "pine" for now. - Bruce -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
