On Friday 15 December 2006 17:22, Warren Turkal wrote: > Known issues: > * haven't bumped soname for C++ yet. I want to see if upstream will do > that.
Ed from upstream had a question: *** I'm not too strong yet on how these numbers are used, but last time I looked into it the conclusion was to release version 3.6.2 of netCDF with: -version-info 0:0:0 Any comments would be welcome. Do you think this is correct? *** Can you please comment on this issue as to what would help us ship a non-modified upstream soname? > * researching cfortran.h issue I have asked upstream to prefer the system version of cfortran.h over the one included in the tarball. > * info pages not moved yet, as I am working with upstream on a configure > script issue The next beta release will use a newer version of autotools that addresses this problem entirely. wt -- Warren Turkal, Research Associate III/Systems Administrator Colorado State University, Dept. of Atmospheric Science
