On (13/01/07 22:12), Krzysztof Burghardt wrote: > Daniel Baumann wrote: > > btw, just curious: are there any reasons to not use the -ssl tarball > > from upstream? > > This problem is known as "OpenSSL and GPL software". What happen if > there is a GPL software (and I'm not copyright holder). I extend its > functionality using POCO classes (assumes that POCO is linked against > OpenSSL). Will copyright holders claim that I infringe on their rights? > This can be enough complicated without SSL as some parts of POCO have 4 > clauses (while other 3 clauses) BSD license. So maybe we do not need to > care.
If poco has parts GPL and parts 4-BSD then you have the problem without even getting OpenSSL involved. James -- James Westby -- GPG Key ID: B577FE13 -- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
