Kevin B McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm. Do you think that the FTP masters should be asked to remove the > netcdf-doc source package from unstable once the new netcdf is there? If > so, I guess there is no problem with including a netcdf-doc binary > package built from the netcdf source package. The existing netcdf-doc > source package is most unlikely to end up on the autobuilders > (especially now that I realize it is of course arch:all) before netcdf > 3.6.2 is in unstable :-)
If a new netcdf source package starts producing the netcdf-doc binary package and that's the only binary package produced by the netcdf-doc source package, netcdf-doc will be removed from the archive semi-automatically without any further action by the maintainer required. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
