Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dear mentors,
> I am a bit confused by the libraries which exist in -xpm and -noxpm > flavors. Are there cases where it is recommended not to use the -xpm > one? Or should we build-depend on foo-xpm | foo-noxpm? Is it necessary > to strictly depend on the -noxpm one if it seems that the program does > not interact with xpm files? > I came to a point in which I often have to remove some packages in order > to build some of the source pacakges I have prepared. I believe this is just GD, isn't it? I'm not sure why GD does that. Maybe because Xpm support requires linking in X libraries, which makes the dependency chain heavier? -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
