On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 16:47 +0300, George Danchev wrote: > On Sunday 15 July 2007, Bart Martens wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 12:02 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > --cut-- > > Something like this ? > > > > packagename (0.1.0-8) unstable; urgency=low > > > > * Updated debian/watch to recognize both ".tar.gz" and ".tar.bz2", > > now revealing the real latest upstream release. > --cut-history-- > > It's not a huge problem, but it's not so nice to have all beginners > > mistakes logged forever for the whole world to see. > > Then you are trying to cheat the world behind the scene, right ? ... in the > name of PR ? If that is the real history, let be it.
No, it's not about "cheat" and "pr" and changing "the real history", but for me it's about what I wrote in my previous messages and about some very reasonable (numbered) part Colin wrote. > > OTOH, as a sponsee, I won't work with sponsors who force me to edit the past > in the name of spurious beautification ;-) No, this debate is not about forcing to summarize debian/changelog, but about forcing to preserve everything in debian/changelog during the entire sponsoring process. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
