On 7/27/07, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So if anyone could tell me what features REVU has that m.d.n is lacking > then I'll consider adding them in the next release. I'm not active in > Ubuntu so I can't tell how things work there. I just see the commenting > feature and colorful icons there. ;)
>From a cursory look at both web pages and the REVU wiki pages; Uploads are based on date/time of the upload rather than version numbers and all of them are kept. Automated archiving of uploaded packages (last I checked, there were still some packages on mentors/sponsor-pkglist that have been uploaded) - 2 examples are paris-traceroute and monotone Nice icons for status :) Automated interdiffs between successive uploads (might be nice to extend this to the versions in the archive) Per-upload commenting I can view the diff.gz files in my browser Can mark comments as 'advocating an upload' Unpacked source trees Lintian/linda output FTBFS checks Changes in upstream tarball (mentioned on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU/REVU-Tools) Source code checking for a debian/watch new upstream available? debian native package? Would be nice to also have autorejects of packages with broken Build-Depends -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
